
Follow the dollar
Private gain ≠ public benefit.
And public cost ≠ automatically a bad deal. The goal is to separate the economics. Do not mash these into one number.
A billion-dollar project does not automatically mean a billion-dollar community benefit.
Private benefits
Developer revenue
Lease, sale, or promote fee on the real estate.
Operator revenue
Colo rent, cloud, or owned-workload margin.
Customer savings
Compute bought here instead of somewhere else.
Land-sale proceeds
The seller of the parcel is not the city.
Investor returns
Funds, REITs, hyperscaler capex recovery.
Cloud / AI services revenue
National product. Local only if the deal captures it.
Capital appreciation
The box can be refinanced. That is private.
Community benefits
Net local tax revenue
Gross minus abatement, by jurisdiction.
Construction employment
Real wages. Finite months.
Permanent local employment
Small specialized crews unless the contract says otherwise.
High-wage technical employment
A benefit only if the hires are real and local.
Local procurement
Invoices, not logos.
Apprenticeships
Electricians are the scarce trade.
University partnerships
Scoped access, not a press photo.
Research infrastructure
An isolated pad the city can actually use.
Grid improvements
A public benefit only if ratepayers are not the residual funder.
Fiber infrastructure
Diverse routes can outlive the tenant.
Community / STEM investment
Dollars, seats, years.
Public-safety improvements
If funded and staffed.
Economic diversification
A claim until suppliers and students show up.
Strategic / national-security capability
Some compute is not optional. Some is ads.
Community costs / risks
Electricity infrastructure
Feeders, substations, generation.
Generation requirements
New MW somewhere on ERCOT.
Transmission requirements
Queue studies are not steel in the ground.
Water consumption
Potable vs reclaimed vs evaporated.
Land consumption
Hall, gray space, setbacks, substation.
Noise
Continuous plant vs test-day generators.
Backup-generator emissions
Permitted hours are not zero hours.
Construction traffic
Temporary, ugly, real.
Public incentives / abatements
A transfer. Read the term sheet.
Environmental impacts
Heat, land cover, diesel, water quality.
Opportunity cost
That parcel is not housing, a factory, or a park.
Grid reliability risk
Sudden drop-off is a NERC concern, not a vibe.
Stranded-infrastructure risk
If they leave, who owns the wire?
Neighborhood incompatibility
Industrial next to houses is a design failure, not a branding failure.
Public infrastructure expense
Roads, fire chemistry, overtime.
These are not the same.
- Capital investmentis notLocal economic benefit
- Company revenueis notLocal tax revenue
- Construction employmentis notPermanent employment
- Announced investmentis notMoney retained locally
- Infrastructure investmentis notA public benefit if ratepayers bear the cost
- High resource useis notAutomatically a bad public investment
The correct question: what does the community receive relative to what it contributes and risks?
Data last checked 2026-09-04 · Current public data is a snapshot, not a live meter
Show me the receipts