Skip to content

Follow the dollar

Private gain ≠ public benefit.

And public cost ≠ automatically a bad deal. The goal is to separate the economics. Do not mash these into one number.

A billion-dollar project does not automatically mean a billion-dollar community benefit.

Private benefits

  • Developer revenue

    Lease, sale, or promote fee on the real estate.

  • Operator revenue

    Colo rent, cloud, or owned-workload margin.

  • Customer savings

    Compute bought here instead of somewhere else.

  • Land-sale proceeds

    The seller of the parcel is not the city.

  • Investor returns

    Funds, REITs, hyperscaler capex recovery.

  • Cloud / AI services revenue

    National product. Local only if the deal captures it.

  • Capital appreciation

    The box can be refinanced. That is private.

Community benefits

  • Net local tax revenue

    Gross minus abatement, by jurisdiction.

  • Construction employment

    Real wages. Finite months.

  • Permanent local employment

    Small specialized crews unless the contract says otherwise.

  • High-wage technical employment

    A benefit only if the hires are real and local.

  • Local procurement

    Invoices, not logos.

  • Apprenticeships

    Electricians are the scarce trade.

  • University partnerships

    Scoped access, not a press photo.

  • Research infrastructure

    An isolated pad the city can actually use.

  • Grid improvements

    A public benefit only if ratepayers are not the residual funder.

  • Fiber infrastructure

    Diverse routes can outlive the tenant.

  • Community / STEM investment

    Dollars, seats, years.

  • Public-safety improvements

    If funded and staffed.

  • Economic diversification

    A claim until suppliers and students show up.

  • Strategic / national-security capability

    Some compute is not optional. Some is ads.

Community costs / risks

  • Electricity infrastructure

    Feeders, substations, generation.

  • Generation requirements

    New MW somewhere on ERCOT.

  • Transmission requirements

    Queue studies are not steel in the ground.

  • Water consumption

    Potable vs reclaimed vs evaporated.

  • Land consumption

    Hall, gray space, setbacks, substation.

  • Noise

    Continuous plant vs test-day generators.

  • Backup-generator emissions

    Permitted hours are not zero hours.

  • Construction traffic

    Temporary, ugly, real.

  • Public incentives / abatements

    A transfer. Read the term sheet.

  • Environmental impacts

    Heat, land cover, diesel, water quality.

  • Opportunity cost

    That parcel is not housing, a factory, or a park.

  • Grid reliability risk

    Sudden drop-off is a NERC concern, not a vibe.

  • Stranded-infrastructure risk

    If they leave, who owns the wire?

  • Neighborhood incompatibility

    Industrial next to houses is a design failure, not a branding failure.

  • Public infrastructure expense

    Roads, fire chemistry, overtime.

These are not the same.

  • Capital investmentis notLocal economic benefit
  • Company revenueis notLocal tax revenue
  • Construction employmentis notPermanent employment
  • Announced investmentis notMoney retained locally
  • Infrastructure investmentis notA public benefit if ratepayers bear the cost
  • High resource useis notAutomatically a bad public investment

The correct question: what does the community receive relative to what it contributes and risks?

Data last checked 2026-09-04 · Current public data is a snapshot, not a live meter

Show me the receipts